The Danger of 2 Million Spotify Users Figuring Out How to Use It Ad-Free

Sure, at first it seems exciting to read that two-million Spotify users figured out how to use the service ad-free, as we all hate ads, especially when you want to listen to your music uninterrupted, but believe it or not, this isn’t really a good thing overall.

If you want the Internet to continue on as it is, you actually need those ads to show up. Without them, there may not be anymore Internet as we know it.

The Ad Breakthrough

news-spotify-ad-free-sign-up

When you listen to Spotify, you have a choice of using a limited version of the service for free or paying for the Premium version for $9.99 a month. In other words, you can get that uninterrupted music you’re looking for, but you’re going to have to pay for it.

Spotify filed something interesting with the SEC on March 23. They stated that this large group of their users were “suppressing advertisements without payment.” Ad-blockers were doing what they were designed to do.

“[We] have detected instances of third parties seeking to provide mobile device users a means to suppress advertisements without payment and gain access to features only available to the Ad-Supported Service on tablets,” reported the SEC filing.

Are you rejoicing? Have you already hit Google trying to figure out which ad-blockers were used? Read on to find out why it might not be such a good thing.

Loss of Funding

news-spotify-ad-free-phone

This is a double loss of income for Spotify. In the first instance, if users aren’t being shown ads and aren’t clicking on them, the streaming service is losing income there. And in the second instance, with so many figuring out how to get the service ad-free without paying the monthly premium, they’re losing out on that subscription money as well.

This is what everyone needs to realize, getting the Internet ad-free is not a good thing. If Spotify loses money, they may have to stop offering their service. Now, instead of having free service ad-free, you have no service.

And if this happens to more ad-supported websites and subscription services, we’ll lose more and more of our services. Imagine if there was no more Netflix or Hulu because users broke it and figured out how to get it for free.

Think of all those services you use, including Make Tech Easier, and what would happen if none of them existed anymore.

news-spotify-ad-free-websites

Affecting the Stock

And the second reason this was particularly hurtful to Spotify is that they claim this led to them overstating their active monthly users. They actually had 157 million users and not 159 at the end of 2017.

It may not seem like that big of of a deal to you, but Spotify filed for an IPO in February on the New York Stock Exchange. Potential investors are looking for accurate reporting of data. With wrong numbers being given, it could affect Spotify’s stock.

So now not only have they lost monthly premiums and ad revenue, now the value of their stock is being affected. This isn’t a good thing for users.

In the End Run

Sure, it’s nice to have an uninterrupted service with no ads that you didn’t have to pay for, but Spotify will end up losing much more than that. If it gets bad enough, they may need to shut their proverbial doors.

In a way this is similar to what happened years ago with the Internet when people were sharing music files for free on Napster. It was great to get all that free music! But if artists aren’t getting paid for their work, they’ll have to stop creating it. That’s why they outlawed it.

Likewise for the Internet. This is business. Website owners need you to view/click those ads so that they can get paid. It’s more than just a paycheck. They have to pay their server monthly or yearly, they have to pay a yearly fee to update the registration on their domain, etc. If there’s no money coming in, they can’t do that, and they lose their business.

Two-million users getting Spotify ad-free with no premium fee is not a good thing for anyone in the long run.

2 comments

  1. If Spotify can detect who is using ad-blockers, can they also not simply use this information to block or suspend those accounts, either on the spot, or later? No big deal. Problem solved? I am fairly sure I was blocked out of some web service or other that I tried to use last year, because I had an ad-blocker in place.

  2. Where is it written that Spotify and other Internet companies are guaranteed revenue, let alone profit?! Where is it written that just because a company exists, the users of its products/services MUST support it, come hell of high water? Under the precepts of capitalism (under which Spotify, et al operate). it is the survival of the fittest. A company formulates a business plan and if the plan works and customers like the product/service, the company survives and makes profit and the stock price goes up. If the business plan does not work or the product/service sucks, the company fails or comes up with a new business plan.

    The business plan which most Internet companies use, is predicated on customers supporting the companies no matter what. Internet companies not only demand that users/customers watch and click on ads, but then they have the gall to harvest user data with users’ knowledge and/or permission, and sell the data. When the users refuse to be monetized, the companies go crying to the SEC or the government. It’s like a burglar complaining that intended victims put bars on windows and doors, preventing him from making a living. Internet companies need a new business plan under which they cooperate with their users, instead of fleecing them. Maybe the Internet companies should get our Congress-critters to pass a law making it a criminal offense not to watch and click on ads.

    As far as the ads go, many people find them irrelevant in content and obnoxious in delivery. Ad providers claim that the ads are targeted. The truth is that ads are more like the line from a poem “I shot an arrow into the air, it fell to earth, I know not where”.

    Ads are one of the major vectors by which malware is delivered.

    “If you want the Internet to continue on as it is, you actually need those ads to show up.”
    We have heard the same song for at least twenty years. Internet hasn’t died yet. In fact it has constantly grown in spite of users not clicking on ads.

    “That’s why they outlawed it. (Napster, LimeWire, etc)”
    They were outlawed because the members of RIAA, the recording companies, were not making as much profits as they thought they should. Artists, unless they are super big names and own their own production companies, were, and are, making peanuts in comparison to the recording companies because those companies signed them to indentured servant type contracts. It is the record companies that are ripping off the artists, not the people who listen to music for free.

Leave a Comment

Yeah! You've decided to leave a comment. That's fantastic! Check out our comment policy here. Let's have a personal and meaningful conversation.