In-Ear vs. Earbud Headphones: Is There a Difference?

In-Ear vs. Earbud Headphones: Is There a Difference? Featured Image

Have you been in the market lately for a snug pair of headphones? If you have, you may have seen two different kinds of headphones on sale, “in-ear” and “earbuds.” Some companies may even advertise their headphones as “in-ear earbuds,” as if they’re the same thing, but they’re not! While they look very similar, they both have different dynamics that suit different people depending on what they want. So what’s the difference?

What Are In-Ear Headphones?

headphone-difference-in-ear

In-ear headphones are sometimes called other things, such as “in-canal” or “earphones” (which makes them even easier to confuse with earbuds). You can gather a picture as to how in-ear headphones work from these names alone. They’re designed to be placed within the ear so that the “cushion” of the earpiece rests within the ear canal.

Because the headphones are firmly lodged within the ear, in-ear headphones tend to stick inside better than earbuds do. Also, because they cover the ear canal, it stops sounds from outside leaking into your music. As such, these are great for when you want to shut the world away for a few moments while you listen to your music.

Because you’re shutting out the world, you’re not competing with outside noises when listening to your music. As a result, you don’t have to blast your music as loud in order to cut through the general hubbub around you. This in turn may lead to saving your eardrums some extra wear and tear down the line!

These aren’t for everyone, however; sometimes in-ear headphones can block airflow between your ear and the outside world. This means that things tend to get sweaty and uncomfortable and make things a little itchy after long periods of use.

What Are Earbuds?

headphone-difference-earbuds

While earbuds do put themselves very close to your ear canal, the key difference is that they never fully enter it. They rest on the concha ridge of your ear, the small outside ridge right before your ear canal. As such, they’re perfect for people who don’t like the feeling of something within their ear canal. In a way they’re like miniature speakers that you put very close to your ear but never inside.

Because of their positioning you may find that earbuds fall out more often than in-canal earphones, simply because it has less of a grip on your ear. The lack of in-canal presence means that you’ll also be hearing your surroundings better, too. This isn’t ideal for people who want to shut out the world, but for those who want to listen to music while still being aware of what’s around them, these make a good alternative to in-ear headphones.

The Confusion

Unfortunately, as mentioned above the terms “in-ear” and “earbuds” often blend together when used in a product description. If you search for “earbuds” on Amazon, you’ll see a lot of in-ear models popping up as a result. It can be tricky to find a “proper” earbud on the market if you’re unsure what you’re looking for.

headphone-difference-product

If you want earbuds and not in-ear headphones, simply look for models that don’t have the “canal cushion” on them. Earbuds look simply like mini-speakers, while in-ear headphones will have the cushion on them. This will allow you to pick out the one that suits you most, even if they’re labelled incorrectly!

Best Buds

While in-ear and earbud headphones may sound very similar, they’re actually quite different with their own use cases. Now you know what each one does; more importantly, you know how to detect which one is which, despite what they’re advertised as!

Which do you prefer? Let us know below.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Simon Batt Avatar

Read next

When Boeing 747-400 pilots needed to update their navigation database as late as 2020, a technician would walk onto the flight deck with eight 3.5-inch floppy disks and feed them one at a time into a slot beside the captain’s seat, because recertifying anything newer than the 1989 avionics would have cost hundreds of millions of dollars.
When the U.S. military finally deployed frequency-hopping spread spectrum on Navy ships during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis blockade, the patent that described the technique had expired three years earlier, and its inventor was watching the news in a Los Angeles bungalow without any idea her idea was at sea.
Suzanne Simard sealed paper birch and Douglas fir seedlings inside plastic bags, fed them carbon-14 and carbon-13 dioxide, and nine days later found carbon had crossed between species through fungal threads in the British Columbia soil beneath her boots
In the small hours of 2 September 1859, a telegraph operator in Portland, Maine disconnected his batteries because they were throwing sparks, and then discovered he could still send a clean message to Boston using nothing but the current the aurora was pushing through the wire above his head.
In 1992, a container ship leaving Hong Kong lost 28,800 plastic bath toys overboard in the North Pacific, and oceanographer Curtis Ebbesmeyer spent the next two decades tracking yellow ducks and blue turtles as they washed up in Alaska, Maine, and eventually the coast of Scotland, quietly rewriting the textbook map of ocean currents.
In 1942, Hollywood actress Hedy Lamarr and avant-garde composer George Antheil received US Patent 2,292,387 for a frequency-hopping radio system synchronised by a perforated paper roll borrowed from a player piano, a technique the Navy filed away as unworkable and which now underpins every Wi-Fi router, Bluetooth earbud, and GPS receiver on Earth.
In 1979, a Sony engineer named Nobutoshi Kihara built the first Walkman prototype in four days because his boss Masaru Ibuka wanted to listen to opera on long flights, and the team launched it with no advertising budget, no headphone jack standard, and an internal forecast of 5,000 units a month that the device beat in its first fortnight.
In 1985, registering a .com domain cost nothing, required a technical request rather than a shopping cart, and produced only six names in twelve months, before the millionth .com arrived in 1997 and the 100 million mark in 2012