What Do You Think Will Happen with Fake News in the Future?

Much has been said in recent weeks regarding the fake news that is published, specifically at Facebook. Not everyone realizes it’s fake news, and it can go on to have an effect if a certain number of people end up believing it. This was the case with the recent presidential election in the United States. It’s been said that the outcome was changed through fake news that was reported and believed about the loser.

But what will happen with fake news moving forward? Now that it’s been identified, will it be easy to put a stop to it? Or now that it has had an impact, will it create a fake news industry so that no one will ever know whether a news story is true or not? We posed this question to our writers to get their take on it – “What do you think will happen with fake news in the future?

Derrik sees it as a problem that “stems from social media.” He believes it’s easy to “pad yourself with your own worldview, to feel safe and comfortable.” He believes it is so prolific because no one wants to be challenged. He thinks to combat it, people need more critical thinking skills and a skeptical mindset. He also thinks if Facebook started doing some fact-checking, it would help the more naive people. Mahesh falls in line with him, stating that “Fake news will continue to exist, and it’s up to the individuals to distinguish between fake and real news.

Ada doesn’t feel there are any efforts that will stop fake news, “while there are morons to fall prey.” She believes that if you only use reputable sources and double-check your facts, that you’ll be safe. Once the majority of people do that, fake news won’t be as much of an issue. The thought here is that if you read news on a reputable news site and not a social one, then it might be true. “Fake news undermines the authority on social media. – it’s like crying wolf.” Ada fears that eventually no one will read anything they read on social media, even if it’s true.

writers-opinion-fake-news-content

Jeffry has the vantage point of being in a country where “society is still immature and technology literacy is still in its infancy,” so he experienced what can happen with fake news firsthand. He thinks it spreads even faster if it’s related to race and religion. “One person can manufacture the fake news, and another will gladly hit the forward button without bothering to check its validity.” He doesn’t see fake news going away any time soon and doesn’t believe there’s anything that can be done to stop it, as it will take maturity, know-how, awareness, and willingness to double-check everything to stop it.

Robert is looking at the issue from a few different angles. He believes social networks could flag the fake news as ultimately they are private companies, and they can decide how they should best deal with it. He doesn’t agree with “outright blocking fake news” but believes some kind of note stating, “This comes from a source associated with fake news” could be good. He also agrees with others that people need to be able to distinguish between real and fake news and that it’s on them to do the research to check the facts.

He also brings up another good point that sometimes it’s not necessarily fake news with the intention of fooling people. Sometimes it’s just satire with the intention of entertaining people. Sites that publish satiric news stories wouldn’t be as fun if they were flagged and there was a big note stating it was false. That’s what makes it so fun. So should everyone lose out on their fun with the satire just because there is a section of people who are unwilling to fact check and will go around and republish it as if it is fact?

We’ve given you much to think about here. It’s obviously a bigger problem than anyone thought if it’s potentially changing elections. Do you agree with our writers? Do you see a way to stop it or no? Does fault lie with social media or with the readers? Sound off below in the comments and let us know what you think. What do you think will happen with fake news in the future?

6 comments

  1. My biggest issue is with Facebook, Google, etal playing police as to what *they* feel constitutes fake news. While fake news may be an issue, the bigger problem are biased entities censoring and manipulating what their users read. Google, Facebook, Twitter and others destroyed any semblance of objectivity during the election cycle.

    They killed trends, censored/banned users, created fake trends, locked out real alternative voices and news sources. Let’s not even get started with “real” news sites like CNN, MSNBC, HuffPro (lol) and others working in collusion with their candidate, misrepresenting data, covering up serious news stories.

    The “fake” news narrative is an attempt to control the news and it’s narrative going forward. This is a lot more serious than anything we’ve faced before in a free-thinking society.

  2. It can be a problem only if people allow it to become one. Remember 10+ years ago when email was flooded with virus hoaxes? Over time, and with a little increase in their technical literacy, they pretty much went away. And do people really need to be told that a movie or novel is not true? Of course not; just go to a theater where a documentary is showing—it is the one with no line.

  3. Most people don’t have time to go to swope to verify everything they read so something should be done. If I read a story that is only on 1 “news” site, there is a good chance that the story is fake. All real news stories usually appear on multiple sites. All news sites should post the source of their story, to allow readers to further research it.

  4. Personally I’m skeptical enough to, not trust everything I read on facebook, but If facebook don’t take steps to clean up their blatant, anything goes so long as there is a profit to be made, act, I will drop facebook and do my socializing elsewhere. Maybe in the real world rather than the virtual world.

  5. “It’s been said that the outcome was changed through fake news that was reported and believed about the loser.”
    Only because the loser was Hillary. Had Trump been the loser, nobody (or only very few) would have questioned the veracity of various reports.

    “What do you think will happen with fake news in the future?”
    First we have to define the term ‘fake news’ rigorously. Is it a totally made up story? Is it a real story with some facts changed or embellished? Is it a story that we do not want to believe because it conflicts with what we believe we ‘know’? Is it a story that is heavily slanted in some way?

    ‘Fake news” will not only flourish in the future but, I suspect, will become the only news available. More and more people find it inconvenient (as in too much bother) to verify news stories on their own. They rely more and more on pundits, analysts and experts to interpret the news. Less and less people question the news that the media delivers. They listen to or read their news stories from media outlets that bolster or agree with their point of view. With more and more people getting their news from the Internet and social networks, the attitude that “If it’s on the ‘Net then it must be true” is becoming more entrenched with each passing day.

  6. Journalism WAS defined as the “Search for Truth”. JOURNALISM IS DEAD!!!

    Today, Journalism has become advocacy. One person’s truth is another person’s “Fake News”. It is incumbent on each citizen to educate themselves on each side of each issue … in order to be able to make intelligent decisions WRT the issues of the day.

Comments are closed.

Sponsored Stories