4 Amazing Computer Cooling Techniques and Their Flaws

Have you ever wondered why we haven’t evolved from the basic fan and heat sink for the cooling of most consumer-level computers? Aside from liquid cooling (which is still a niche market at best), there seems to be no other alternative available. There are, however, a few people who aren’t satisfied with simply thinking outside the box when it comes to CPU/GPU cooling. They take that box, rip it out, and put their own in its place. Despite their best efforts, there’s still a good reason why we’re sticking to heat sinks and fans.

The first image that pops into most people’s heads when listening to the word “cool” is their fridge. It’s logical, right? The appliance is loaded with a gas known as freon that circulates through a compressor in a way that cools down any given volume in a relatively short time.

It turns out that people have been building freon-cooled PCs for a while now. Check out this video from 2011:

Here’s the flaw: As the air around your CPU gets cooler, the natural vapor in that air begins to condense. Condensation and electronics are sworn enemies. If you get enough of that condensation to drip onto an active part of your circuit board, you can wave goodbye to your computer. To solve this, you either need to coat your entire motherboard with rubber that leads into a drip pan, or leave it inside a vacuum with absolutely no humidity. Freon cooling is a nice gimmicky idea, but it’s not a viable long-term cooling solution for most people.

OK, so anything producing condensation doesn’t work. What about mineral oil? It doesn’t conduct electricity, it’s non-corrosive, and your computer looks cool submerged into an aquarium full of the stuff. In addition to all this, your computer will run so silently, you’ll forget it’s even there. See an example in the video below.

Here’s the flaw: Since oil is viscous, thermal buildup is a definite possibility. You will have to compensate for that by pumping the oil upwards where it can meet with cooler air and come back down when it’s cooled sufficiently. This isn’t so much of a flaw, since it’s easily remedied. However, the main flaw of mineral oil cooling is that if you ever need to perform maintenance, you need to be prepared to dip your hands in oil, which can get messy. Also, you may void the warranty of your pieces (the void stickers may fall off due to the moist environment).

Sometimes you want to go the full nine yards. It’s in those moments that you start considering extreme options like liquid nitrogen, a gas that in its liquid state reaches around -195 degrees Celsius (-320ºF). You can see how someone manages this kind of cooling setup below.

Here’s the flaw: I don’t think I need to state it, but I will anyway: Nitrogen evaporates quickly in room temperature. It’s a great cooling medium for short-term use (like breaking a record in benchmarking software leaderboards). For use throughout an entire day, it gets complicated to say the least. Never mind the fact that you have to fully insulate the CPU’s “nest” from the rest of the motherboard. You also have to constantly refill the supply of nitrogen. If you have a laboratory that gives you a constant supply, though, it might be worth a shot!

Water cooling has always been a top choice for most of the enthusiast market. Now, what if you had a pipeline that channeled water from a swimming pool through it all day? That would be a very copious supply of water pumped right to your PC without needing to take extra steps to disinfect the lines (to prevent algae buildup).

pccooling-swimmingpool

Here’s the flaw: Algae may no longer be a problem, but if you have hard water, expect to maintain the lines for calcium buildup. In all sincerity, this is a very neat system, and if you can manage it, consider it a way to save money (aside from the massive sum you’re already spending from maintaining a pool you’re not swimming in). Your CPU disperses heat, making it cost less to heat the pool. In addition to this, your pool’s chlorine is already disinfecting everything for you, and you don’t have to invest in a pump and other equipment.

If you have thought of a new way to cool a PC, and would like to discuss its flaws, lend us a comment!

6 comments

  1. Liquid cooling is so inexpensive compared to the cumbersome and expensive water cooling of the past. Why would anyone go to the extremes to get what liquid cooling products will do for $100 or less?

  2. What if the entire pc is submerged into liquid nitrogen into a sealed box.
    Sorry for my English.

    • In the end, it could be possible, but you would need a tremendous amount of power to do that either way. The heat generated by the computer will ultimately raise the temperature of the vessel.

  3. How about a PC in a case filled with mineral oil and a CPU heatsink chilled with 134a? Insulate the reefer lines going into the tank to mitigate moisture contamination? In order to alleviate moisture buildup, elevate the components slightly from the floor of the tank and design a tank with a sump. Mineral oil’s specific gravity IIRC is .85, so if any moisture does find its way in, down to the sump it goes, where it can be discharged with a simple drain petcock.

    The 134a heatsink is in direct contact with the CPU, and has fins to increase surface area, which will absorb heat from the surrounding mineral oil as well, and a pump would circulate the oil inside the tank to help increase thermodynamic equillibrium.

    Would that work?

  4. I have been dreaming about magnetic cooling induction for years. I have desired to use a closed atmosphere chassis with a piston driven magnetic cooler using helium as the medium.

Comments are closed.

Sponsored Stories